
Country Report
1. Introduction
Location: Southwest Asia, east of Turkey
Geographic coordinates: 40 00 N, 45 00 E
Land area:
Total 29.800 sq km
Land 28.400 sq km
Water 1.400 sq km
Border countries:
Azerbaijan-Naxcivan exclave 221 km
Iran 35 km
Turkey 268 km
Climate: highland continental
Cold winters
Terrain: Armenian Highland with mountains;
Little forestland;
Fast flowing rivers
Elevation
extremes:
Lowest point:
Debed River 400 m
Highest point:
Aragats Lerr 4.095 m
Natural resources:
Country name
Conventional long form: Republic of
Armenia
Conventional short form: Armenia
Local long form: Hayastani
Hanrapetutjun
Local short form: Hayastan
Former: Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic
Government
Type: Republic
Capital: Yerevan
10 provinces and 1 city
28 may 1918 (first Armenian
Republic)
23 September 1991 (from Soviet Union)
Referendum day, 21 September
Adopted by nationwide referendum 5 July 1995
Legal system:
Presidental
rule
Chief of state:
President elected by popular vote for a five-year
time
Head of Government: Prime
Minister appointed by the President
Cabinet: Council of Ministers appointed by the Prime Minister
elections
Legislative branch:
Unicameral National Assembly or Azgayin Zhogov
Judicial branch: Supreme Court; Constitutional
Court
Military Branches:
Army, Air Force and Air Defense Aviation, Air Defense Force, Security Forces
3,344,386
Christian 96%
Church:
Armenian Apostolic
Languages:
Armenian 96%
Russian 2%
Other 2%
Extended family system
Literacy rate:
Definition: age 15 and over can read and
write
Industries:
tires; knitted wear; hosiery; shoes;
chemicals; trucks; instruments
natural gas; petroleum;
foodstuffs; tobacco products
Exports: diamonds; scrap metal; machinery;
cognac; brandy; mineral water; beer
Major international humanitarian organizations in Armenia:
|
|
OCHA
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs |
|
|
USAID
US Agency for International Development |
|
|
UNDP
United Nations Development Programme |
|
|
ARCS
Armenian Red Cross Society |
2.
Armenian experience in seismic risk reduction
Caucasus countries are the regions of numerous natural and manmade hazards. Analysis of the loss caused by various hazards revealed that the most catastrophic ones for the region are strong earthquakes.
Caucasus countries are in the zone of high seismic hazard of Alpine-Himalayan and Balkan-Carpathian seismic belts. Strong earthquakes are known here from the 19th century B.C. up to present, for instance: Izmit (Turkey) in August 1999, M=7.4; Athens (Greece) in September 1999, M=5.8; Dyuzge (Turkey) in November 1999, M=7.2.
One of the most tragic seismic events in the history of the region was the Spitak earthquake that shook Armenia on December 7, 1988. More than 25,000 died, 20,000 were injured and 515,000 became homeless. Large-scale destruction of buildings and structures occurred almost in all the towns and settlements of Northern Armenia.
![]() |
Before the 1988 Spitak earthquake, neither the
leadership of the Republic nor the population had been prepared to protect the
republic against a large earthquake in
Armenia.
For a number of reasons this problem has not been
considered at all. These reasons included the following:
–
protection of people against earthquakes was not considered an
all-Union problem in the USSR, because only an insignificant part of the Soviet
population resided in seismically-active zones; consequently, only the USSR
Academy of Science was considered with earthquakes, and they considered them
merely as interesting natural phenomena;
–
the solution of all problems in the USSR was strongly centralized, and
the leadership of the Republic was not able to put forward or solve any
large-scale problems requiring great material expenditure and resources.
The period following the Spitak earthquake coincides
with the period of social order change in Armenia and its formation as an
independent state. This allowed us to advance the problem of protecting the
Armenia population against large earthquakes to the foreground of national
problems.
According its the project proposed by Prof. Dr. S. Balassanian to the President, Parliament and Government of the Republic of Armenia, the National Survey For Seismic Protection (NSSP) was founded under the Government of the Republic of Armenia on July 17, 1991. Armenian NSSP was given special governmental status and ministerial powers. The President of the Armenian NSSP is directly subordinated to the Prime Minister.
![]() |
The basic goal of Armenian NSSP is Seismic Risk Reduction in Armenia.
Armenian NSSP has developed two Strategic National Programs on "Seismic Risk Reduction in Armenia" and "Seismic Risk Reduction in Yerevan-city". The Programs, adopted by the Government of the Republic of Armenia on the 10th and 7th of July in 1999 are designed for 30 years. All the Ministries and other Governmental, non-Governmental and private organizations will implement these National Programs under the general co-ordination of Armenian NSSP assigned by the Government as a responsible body for the Seismic Risk Reduction Strategy development and implementation.
![]() |
The Armenian NSSP has significant
achievements in the filed of seismic risk reduction.
The main of them are:
· Seismic Hazard Assessment. The main goal of the carried out work is to re-activate the seismic hazard assessment programme in the Crimea-Caucasus-Kopet Dagh region by establishing the “Caucasus” test are for multi-national, multi-disciplinary, multi-method assessment of seismic hazard, in co-operation with organizations in neighboring countries (Iran, Turkey) and with international scientific agencies and programmes – International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth Interior (IASPEI), the European Seismological Commission (ESC) and the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Programme (GSHAP). These first probabilistic maps of SHA have been created.
|
|
·
Current Seismic Hazard Assessment. A unique multi-parameter
network has been established. It consists of 150 monitoring stations performing
round-the-clock data acquisition and analysis. Expert
systems for current seismic hazard assessment have been created.
|
|
· New Seismic Zonation Map for the territory of Armenia on the scale of 1:500000 was complied at the NSSP RA in collaboration with the Swiss Seismological Survey. In 1998 the map was finally approved by the NSSP and submitted to the Government of Armenia as a new strategic basis for the safe urbanization of the territory of Armenia.
|
|
·
New Methods for Reinforcement of Buildings and Structures. New methods for
increasing the earthquake resistance of buildings and structures have been developed
and successfully tested and implemented in practice.
·
New Seismic Construction Codes. Armenian NSSP took part in
creation of the first seismic construction codes for Armenia.
In 1994 the former Building Code was substituted by the new Seismoresistant Construction Design Code. It has been developed by joint efforts of organizations involved in design and construction as well as seismic protection.
The main principal changes comparing with the
previous Building Code are the followings:
1. Seismic impact intensity is estimated by the maximum horizontal ground acceleration according to the seismic zones as follows:
Izone –200 cm/sec2 (A=0.2)
IIzone -300 cm/sec2 (A=0.3)
III zone – 400 cm/sec2 (A=0.4)
2. Horizontal seismic loading Ski which is corresponding to the i-th mode of building or structure free oscillations applied to the point k is calculated through the formula:
Ski=QkAKohkic comparing to the former
Ski=QkA*hkib*i
A* for the intensities of 7,8 and 9 was accepted 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 correspondingly. Now they are equal to 0.2; 0.3; 0.4.
Ko- is conventional factor for soil conditions,
Ist soil cotegory – 0.8
IInd soil cotegory – 1.0
IIId soil cotegory – 1.2
IVth soil cotegory – 1.4
In the previous version of Building Code this factor has been taken into account by the coefficient b*i - the coefficient of dynamics.
In the new Code the coefficient of dynamics is calculated through the new formulas depending on the soil category and on the period of the i-th mode of the building free oscillations.
For example:
For Ist soil category
bi=1+7.5Ti, when 0<Ti£0.2
bi=1+2.5, when 0.2<Ti£0.4
bi=1.35.Ti-2/3, when Ti= 0.4
For II-nd and III-d categories
bi=1+3.75Ti, when 0<Ti£0.4
bi=2.5, when 0.4<Ti£0.7
bi=2.0Ti-2/3, when Ti³0.7
3. The values of strains are accounted for “soil-structure” interaction.
4. For all seismic zones the residential buildings are allowed up to 5 storeys.
5. For hospitals and schools upper limit is 3 storeys.
6. Design of important objects are made under higher safety (using the increasing factor of up to 1.35)
7. The seismic resistance measures such as sizes of openings, counter-seismic seams and others are revised, depending on specific construction features.
Now by the initiative of the NSSP the Code for Seismic Microzonation
is under preparation. Al the interested organizations in Armenia are involved
in this work.
·
Early Warning Systems and Notification. An Early Warning System
based on the current seismic hazard assessment has been developed and is under
realization. A project of Early Warning System based on automatic registration
and determination of the parameters of destructive seismic wave propagation is
under preparation. A project of Early Warning System based on the fast
determination of earthquake parameters and estimation of possible destruction
and human loss is under preparation.
·
Development of Large-scale Initiatives and Projects for regional and
international co-operation in the field of population protection against
earthquakes, including all scientific and social aspects of the problem.
·
State Disaster Law and Regulations. The Law on Seismic
Protection has been prepared and submitted to Armenian Parliament and
Government.
DRAFT
ON SEISMIC PROTECTION OF POPULATION
Article 1. The object of regulation of the law
Article 2. The basic conception using on this
law
Article 3. The juridical sources on seismic
protection of population
Article 4. The structure on seismic protection
of population
Article 5. The
rules of population awareness on seismic hazard
CHAPTER 2
THE GOVERNMENTAL
REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT ON SEISMIC PROTECTION OF POPULATION
Article 6. The
governmental regulation of the structure on seismic protection of population
Article 7. The
governmental management on seismic protection of population
CHAPTER 3
THE
GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL IN THE FIELD ON SEISMIC PROTECTION OF POPULATION
Article
8. Organization of governmental
control in the field on seismic protection of population
Article
9. The objects are subordinate to administration on seismic protection of population
in the territory of Armenia
CHAPTER
4
THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VIOLATION IN THE FIELD ON SEISMIC PROTECTION OF
POPULATION
Article
10. The violation in the field on
seismic protection of population
CHAPTER
5
THE
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD ON SEISMIC PROTECTION OF POPULATION
Article
11. The juridical basis of the international cooperation in the field on
seismic protection of population
Article
12. The interrelation of the constitution of the Republic of Armenia and of the
international agreements in the field on seismic protection of population
CHAPTER
6
THE
INSURANCE SYSTEM AGAINST EARTHQUAKE ON THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
Article 13. The conception of the insurance against earthquake in
the Republic of Armenia
Article 14. The rules of the
insurance for life, health, property on the citizen of the Republic of Armenia
Article 15. The rules of the
insurance of property of the governmental, non-governmental organizations.
This law is available after the official adoption by Armenian Parliament
and Government.
·
Risk Management, including Emergency Response and Rescue
Operations. The Rapid Response Forces were organized for operation in
strong earthquake epicentral zone. They include rescuers and scientific staff
for rescue activities and scientific investigations immediately after a strong
earthquake.
Armenia Helps the
Earthquake-Stricken India
Under the directive of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia,
on February 2, 2001 the Armenian NSSP fully equipped Task Force was sent to
India to help earthquake-stricken population along with 200 kg of relief aid
medicines.
The Task Forces arrived in Ahmedabad (Gujarat state) on February 3 and
commenced to work. They already inspected about 130 buildings, installed the strong
motion devices, and the local authorities and population were supported. The
local authorities and dwellers render full assistance to Task Force.
Task Forces activities were highly appreciated by Indian government and
local authorities. Indian minister of construction arrived in Ahmedabad to
express his gratitude to Armenian experts specially emphasizing the activities
of Armenian seismologists, geologists, structural engineers, physicians and
psychologists in this post-earthquake operative stage.
The Indian mass media show a great interest in work carried out by
Armenian NSSP multi-profile Task Force. “Headband Age” newspaper’s observer
Anil Nairheadlined his news now report- “Armenian Team to Start Work in
Headband”.
Task Force is headed by Prof. S. Nazaretyan
-a well-known seismologist, Head of the Northern Department of Armenian
NSSP. The team comprise seismologists, structural and communication engineers,
physicians and rescuers all together- 18 members.
Armenian NSSP Task Force solve the following tasks in disaster area:
1)
measuring strong ground motions for the current seismic hazard
assessment;
2) expert analysis of the character of collapsed buildings and structures for their effective restoration and rehabilitation;
3) long-term seismic hazard assessment (seismomicrozonation) for complete restoration of disaster area;
4) strong aftershocks
prediction;
5) medical, psychological and rescue assistance.
The assistance during strong earthquake has 4 phases:
Operational (few days), short-term (one month), medium-term (a year),
long-term (more than a year). The well-organized State Survey for Seismic
Protection is very important in all stages -it guidelines the activities of the
federal and local authorities during search & rescue and demolition works.
The Task Force goal is to promptly smooth down the consequences of
disaster.
Their gratitude to Armenian NSSP Task Force Activities in Gujarat were
expressed by:
Ambassador of India in Armenia, Indian Government officials to ambassador of Armenia in India, UN Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs to President of Armenian NSSP.
·
Population Education. The Center for people education and training in
the field of protection against earthquakes has been established in Armenian
NSSP. Education system involves instructors, mass media, TV and radio.
In 1998 in Geneva the Armenian NSSP has been
awarded by the “Certificate of Distinction” of the United Nations Sasakawa
Disaster Prevention Award in appreciation for its distinguished contribution to
disaster prevention, mitigation and preparedness, and furthering the goals of
the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction.
1998
presented
to
In appreciation for its
distinguished contribution
to disaster prevention,
mitigation and preparedness
and furthering the goals of the
Geneva
14 October
1998
Mr. Sergio
Vieira de Mello
Under-Secretary-General
for Humanitarian Affairs
NSSP STRUCTURE
Armenian NSSP has staff of nearly 1700, out of which are 300 scientists, 300 engineers and technicians. Armenian NSSP combines all seismic risk reduction related scientific studies including geophysics, geology, geochemistry, geodesy and earthquake engineering, sociology, psychology. Armenian NSSP has a unique multi-parameter observation network for monitoring of Earth lithosphere and atmosphere consisting of 150 stations. Armenian NSSP is divided into 3 regional departments with appropriate centers organized according to research directions and basic goals.
Armenian NSSP has a unique structure:
- The NSSP is lead by the President, assigned by the Prime
Minister of Armenia;
- The President of the NSSP makes important decisions in
the field of seismic protection of the population, based on the three Councils:
NSSP Council is reviewing and confirming the internal problems
and documents of the NSSP;
Expert Council is reviewing and confirming the normative
documents in the field of seismic protection of the population;
Scientific-technical Council is forming the
scientific-technical policy and developing the International collaboration in
the field of seismic risk reduction.
|
|
The President of the NSSP is managing the
NSSP through the Management Institution, which coordinates the activities of
the NSSP Departments, making connection between the NSSP and other Governmental
Institutions, private and public organizations.
Armenian NSSP includes three administrative departments:
·The Northern Department (center is Giumri
city);
·The Central Department (center is Yerevan city);
·The Southern Department (center is Kapan
city).
|
|
Each administrative department has uniform subdivisions, solving the
whole spectrum of problems, connected with seismic protection of the population
(from seismic hazard and risk assessment to earthquake-engineering and
earthquake-resistant construction code development, from seismic knowledge
dissemination and training of the population to prompt response and rescue
operations etc.). The uniform subdivisions of the NSSP departments are
connected with each other horizontally by the same problems and have strict
vertical subordination to the Head of Department, who is under the NSSP
President subordination.
International Conferences,
Workshops organized by the Armenian NSSP
On September 15-21, 1998 The Second International Conference on "Earthquake Hazard and Seismic Risk Reduction" - the IDNDR Regional Conference for the Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and Central and Eastern Europe, Commemorating the 10th Anniversary of the Spitak Earthquake was held, where more than 300 experts from 43 countries participated. The Conference adopted following Declaration:
YEREVAN DECLARATION
The Second International
Conference on “Earthquake Hazard and Seismic Risk Reduction”
- The International Decade
for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) Regional Conference for the Countries of
the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and Central and Eastern Europe -
Commemorating the 10th
Anniversary of the Spitak Earthquake
15-21 September 1998
Yerevan, Armenia
The Second International Conference on “Earthquake
Hazard And Seismic Risk Reduction” - The International Decade for Natural Disaster
Reduction (IDNDR) Regional Conference for the Countries of the Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS) and Central and Eastern Europe - dedicated to the 10th Anniversary of the Spitak Earthquake
(later referred to as Yerevan Conference), summarized the experiences and
achievements of different countries in the field of seismic risk reduction and
other natural disaster reduction, as well as discussed possible strategies for
disaster reduction in the 21st century. The participants of the Conference would like to draw the
attention of the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Armenian
Government to the following:
1.
The meeting brought together more than 300 participants from 43
countries, including all the countries of the CIS, several countries from
Central and Eastern Europe and Asia, and Greece, Germany, the US and
others. The participants included
local and national decision-makers, scientists, disaster reduction experts and
representatives from research institutes.
There were also representatives from the private sector and the media.
The Conference was sponsored by the Government of the Republic of Armenia and
the IDNDR Secretariat. The
conference was organized by the National Survey for Seismic Protection (NSSP)
of the Republic of Armenia.
2.
The conference was inaugurated by the Prime Minister of the Republic of
Armenia, the All-Armenian Patriarch and the Director of the IDNDR
Secretariat. Both the PM and the
Patriarch of RA noted in their keynote addresses that in order to overcome the
obstacles that disasters pose to national and regional sustainable development,
technically consistent disaster prevention measures should be adopted. They also noted that with the
increasing scale of disasters that experts project for the 21st century,
scientists, local, regional and national authorities and religious community
leaders must come together in order to devise a strategy for the prevention of
the impacts of hazards on the population, vital infrastructure and property. Particular emphasis must be placed on
the protection of vital social and economic infrastructure because these are
intimately linked to the ability of a country to function appropriately, for
the guarantee of business
continuity and hence economic growth, and the potential of a country to prosper
and develop. The subsequent
discussions and presentations at the conference stressed that disaster
reduction should continue to be a major priority in regional, national and
international development and civil protection strategies.
3.
While there have been notable achievements in natural disaster
reduction during the Decade, and while awareness of risk from natural disasters
has increased considerably at the global scale, there remain areas where loss
of life and the impoverishment of large communities continue to increase at an
alarming rate. The participants anticipate that the severity and frequency of
natural and environmental disasters, and their impact on society, will
intensify in near future. The
participants reaffirmed the central importance of disaster reduction as an
essential element of government policy. Recent events and disasters have again
demonstrated the need for permanent sustained strategies to reduce disaster
risk in order to save lives and protect economic and social assets.
4.
Within the framework of the Yerevan Conference, the 5th Conference on
Cooperation of Central, Eastern and South-Eastern European Countries on the
Protection Against Natural and Other Disasters (The “Magdeburg Process”) was
held from 15-17 September. The 5th
Magdeburg Conference brought together all the Ministers and Heads of
Departments for Civil Protection from the countries of the CIS, and many
representatives from Central and Eastern Europe, including Hungary, Slovenia,
Germany, Croatia and Austria. The
5th Magdeburg Conference provided the necessary political backdrop for the
discussions on disaster prevention, reduction and response taking place on the
10th Anniversary of the Spitak Earthquake. The 5th Magdeburg Conference held rescue exercises in
Gyumri, Armenia as well as discussions on the future of the IDNDR. The 5th Magdeburg Conference was organized by the Emergency
Management Administration of the Republic of Armenia.
5.
Another important component of the Yerevan Conference was the
organization and hosting of the RADIUS Initiative mid-term Workshop for the
evaluation of progress in the RADIUS Case Studies and for discussions on urban
seismic risk reduction practices.
The RADIUS Initiative was launched by the IDNDR Secretariat, aiming to
prepare earthquake disaster scenarios and the risk management plans in 9
selected cities worldwide and develop manuals for seismic risk assessment in
urban areas. The progress of the
RADIUS Case Studies was reported during the session as well as the achievements
of similar effects in other cities.
It was stressed in the session that the scientific knowledge should be
applied in an appropriate way, involving various sectors of the community such
as the decision makers, press, public and private sectors.
6.
The participants noted the need for the exchange and transfer of
up-to-date scientific technology and the strengthening of international
cooperation in the field of disaster reduction, in particular in the field of
seismic risk reduction. A forum
for this cooperation, in the form of an international coordinated framework,
was proposed as a desirable initiative for the improvement of scientific and
technical cooperation in the field of disaster reduction.
7.
The participants reiterated the need to move away from a disaster
response oriented approach towards disaster prevention and reduction
methodologies. The participants
stated their appreciation for the important work that the IDNDR has carried out
over the past decade in order to reduce the vulnerability of communities around
the world to natural disasters, through the promotion and coordination of
Disaster Reduction worldwide.
8.
The participants expressed their belief that effective disaster
reduction depends upon a multi-sectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration
among all concerned actors, as successfully demonstrated during the Yerevan
Conference.
9.
Strategies for seismic risk reduction in 21st century must
focus more on “Preparedness and
Prevention” rather than only the “Recovery” approach.
10.
One of the most important elements for the implemention of
“Preparedness and Prevention” is the
development of long-term
Government policies in the field of disaster risk reduction.
11.
The participants of the Conference fully recognized and acknowledged the
significant achievements of the NSSP RA in the field of seismic risk reduction
and international cooperation in this field. The program of future work of the NSSP RA is appropriate and
well planned.
12.
The importance of consolidating the final phase of the Decade on a
regional scale was recognized as appropriate since countries of the same region
share a common history, types of risk and often have coordinated strategies for
disaster reduction. The participants
noted in particular that the Yerevan Conference, which is the IDNDR Regional
Conference for the Countries of the CIS and Central and Eastern Europe has been
a very useful forum for the exchange of disaster reduction information and the
coordination of future disaster reduction strategies in the region.
13.
The participants of the Conference highly appreciate the agreements on
cooperation reached between the Seismological Surveys of Armenia, Azerbaijan
and Georgia based on the understanding that the nature of seismic hazards is
trans-boundary and trans-regional and that close collaboration between the countries of the region is
absolutely necessary for
protecting the population against strong earthquakes.
14.
The participants of the Conference express their gratitude to the
Government of Armenia, UN/IDNDR, and NSSP of Armenia for organizing and holding
a very successful Conference.
RECOMMENDATIONS
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that NSSP be used as a
model for seismic risk reduction initiatives in other countries of the region.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that Armenia be considered
as one of the international test areas for the carrying-out of comprehensive
scientific engineering and technical investigations for the protection of populations
against strong earthquakes.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that NSSP of Armenia act
as the UN Caucasus Regional Center for Seismic Risk Reduction in close
cooperation with focal points in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Russia.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that a distinct and
visible capacity within the UN system be set up as a successor to the IDNDR
Secretariat in order to ensure an effective and continued international support
to ongoing efforts in disaster reduction after the close of the Decade. This permanent disaster reduction
capacity should have a multi-disciplinary mandate and global geographic
coverage, to act as a catalyst for environmentally and socially sustainable
development through effective disaster reduction.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that RADIUS-type projects
be carried-out in other cities that are facing the threats of strong
earthquakes. Similar efforts
should be initiated in as many communities as possible, following the manual, which
will be developed through RADIUS, based on the experiences of the Case
Studies. The projects should set
up the conditions for the initiation of long-term risk management processes,
which should be institutionalized.
The final goal is to make the cities and their people capable to solve,
by themselves, the problems affecting their communities.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that RADIUS-type
initiatives be administered (by the successor to the IDNDR Secretariat, should
one be formed) for other types of hazards, including floods and forest
fires. These initiatives should be
limited in time (suggested time frame 3 or 4 years) and have clearly defined
measurements of success. They
should each have independent funding arrangements and country
participation. The participants
also recommend that the scope of these initiatives not be limited to hazard
risk assessment and risk management plans, but also include the development and
use of early warning systems. A
closer cooperation with the private sector in order to improve economic impact
reduction should also be introduced into the above-mentioned initiatives.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that, for the development
and realization of Government policies in the field of seismic risk reduction,
coordination and management bodies at both the national and international
levels are necessary. A model for such a body on the international level could
be a distinct seismic risk reduction subprogram of a cross-cutting disaster
reduction organization such as the IDNDR Secretariat, and, on the national
level, an interagency governmental body which would act as the focal point for
seismic risk reduction activities.
The latter organization should benefit from contributions and
participation from all sectors of the Government and society relevant to
seismic risk reduction.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that the UN and the
Governments of different states promote the collaboration of authorities
responsible for the protection of cultural heritage from natural disasters,
technical institutes, and humanitarian actors in order to prevent the
deterioration of cultural heritage monuments.
•
The participants of the Conference recommend that the international
community answer the calls for assistance from the three Governors of Northern Armenia who have requested
help in rehabilitating the Spitak disaster zone, where roughly 1 million people
continue to live in very difficult conditions.
Nowadays the NSSP RA takes part in the
following international agreements and programs:
INTERNATIONAL
PROJECTS
·
INTAS (International Test Area for SHA in
the Caucasus), and GSHAP (Global SHA Program), "Short period time dynamics of the seismicity
" Italy and Russia.
·
"COPERNICUS" " Tectonic early
warning system through real time radon (RN)
monitoring; a geophysical method for forecasting earthquakes", with
Greece, UK, Russia and
Albania.
·
PICS (Program International Cooperation
on Scientific) of the National Center
of Scientific Research. "Intensity
fields, hydrogeochemical variations of underground water and kinematics of
faults in a seismic zone: on the example of the Lesser Caucasus
(Armenia)", with France.
·
GPS (Global Positional Satellite Geodesic
System). Study on Regional
Deformations on the Territory of Armenia, with Bulgaria, Germany,
Georgia, Greece, Egypt, Russia, Turkey, the USA and Switzerland. The Study of
strong movements of the
ground on the territory of Armenia on the basis of Swiss stations
·
SMACH-1 with Switzerland. The study of
strong movements of the ground on the territory of Armenia and Georgia with
Georgia and Russia. Cooperation in the field of historical earthquakes
catalogues with Italy.
·
NATO Science for Peace Programme. Draft programs: "Oil Pollution
Detection in Ground Water from Real Time Early Warning to Overall
Assessment" with Greece, Macedonia. "Archaeo-tomographer: design,
development and evaluation of a high-tech geophysical system for the
three-dimensional imaging of the archaeological sites", with Albania,
Bulgaria Georgia, Greece, Russia, Turkey. "Risk assessment of natural and
manmade disasters and planning of
countermeasures for prevention or mitigation of losses for big cities in
the Caucasus", with
Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia.
The Foundation of Seismic Protection of Armenia
is a charitable public organization established
to render public assistance in enlargement and development of activity of the
Armenian NSSP. In its activity the Foundation proceeds from national interests
and social signification of the projects and
programs to be carried out on increasing the level of seismic safety of the
republic's population.
Councils
|
DISASTERS IN ARMENIA |
|
Earthquakes 94% / Other hazards 6%
|
| The human loss caused by different types of disaster in Armenia |
|
Earthquakes – 94 % Mudslides – 3.15 % Transport accidents – 1.5 % Landslides and rockfalls – 1.2 % Floods – 0.15 % Irradiation – 0 % |
DISASTER REDUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
![]() |
![]() |
Armenian NSSP is a responsible body for prediction of seismic hazard, seismic risk assessment and seismic risk reduction
Armenian Emergency Situation Department is a responsible body for population security, protection and risk reduction during emergencies caused by natural and technological disasters.